| whafford ( @ 2008-10-05 14:29:00 |
| Entry tags: | money |
Busy busy
With three things all coming to a deadline tomorrow, I've been away from LJ for a long time. I'm advising potential Rhodes fellows and their deadline is Monday, I'm organizing midterm portfolios for my students, and those are due Monday, and I'm also giving the Anthropology Colloquium talk at 4:30 on Monday afternoon [Museum room 345].
That latter deadline is the one that has taken most of my time, I admit. I've been gathering data for this for years and it's about bloody time I presented some results. This one is a longer talk about the bigger implications of weights and weighing in the Bronze Age Near East, but I'll present again in Boston on November at the American Schools of Oriental Research meetings on the more specific analysis of weights from the ancient city of Ur in Iraq.
So even now, I don't have much time to make a good entry to LJ. I'll post this week's prompt from my money class here and see what you all think, though:
Georg Simmel states that when money stops moving it is no longer money. Indeed, the idea of circulation is very important in regards to an economy and one of the functions of money is as a means of payment. But just how far and how fast does our physical money move? For an idea of this concept, go to www.wheresgeorge.com and look at a few examples from the pulldown menu, 'George's Top 10.' The first item on that menu is 'Bills.' Click on it and choose two or three of the top 10 bills. How far and how fast did those bills move? Do you think this is an accurate depiction of circulation of the US dollar?